Further Background on Kyoto Protocol and EU ETS
9 Appendix
9.1 Annex-I and Annex-B Countries
9.2 Allocation under the Burden Sharing Agreement
9.4 Carbon Dioxide Equivalents (CO2eq)
9.5 Electricity Generation in the EU 25
9.6 Different Types of Allowances
9.7 Surplus of allocation over 2005 verified emissions
click below to access the above topics.
9.1 Annex-I and Annex-B Countries
Annex I countries are referred to as the 36 industrialized countries and economies in transition (EIT) which are listed in Annex I to the UNFCCC.
They have agreed on various responsibilities, including a non-binding commitment to reduce their GHGs to 1990 levels by the year 2000.[67]
Â
The Annex B countries to the Kyoto protocol are the 39 emissions capped industrial countries that have agreed to set a ceiling to the amount of greenhouse gases they emit within the first commitment period 2008-2012. This commitment is legally binding and the obligations range from 8% reduction to a 10% increase compared to 1990 levels.
Annex-B includes all Annex-I countries except Belarus and Turkey, whilst Croatia, Liechtenstein, Monaco and Slovenia are listed in Annex B but not Annex I.
Â
The following table shows the countries and their commitment.
Â
Countries and their quantified emission limitation or reduction commitment as percentage of base year or period |
|||
Australia |
108 |
Liechtenstein* |
92 |
Austria |
92 |
Lithuania (EIT) |
92 |
Belarus (EIT) |
 |
Luxembourg |
92 |
Belgium |
92 |
Monaco* |
92 |
Bulgaria (EIT) |
92 |
Netherlands |
92 |
Canada |
94 |
New Zealand |
100 |
Croatia (EIT)* |
95 |
Norway |
101 |
Czech Republic (EIT) |
92 |
Poland (EIT) |
94 |
Denmark |
92 |
Portugal |
92 |
Estonia (EIT) |
92 |
Romania (EIT) |
92 |
European Community |
92 |
Russian Federation (EIT) |
100 |
Finland |
92 |
Slovakia (EIT) |
92 |
France |
92 |
Slovenia (EIT)* |
92 |
Germany |
92 |
Spain |
92 |
Greece |
92 |
Sweden |
92 |
Hungary (EIT) |
94 |
Switzerland |
92 |
Iceland |
110 |
Turkey |
 |
Ireland |
92 |
Ukraine (EIT) |
100 |
Italy |
92 |
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
92 |
Japan |
94 |
United States of America |
93 |
Latvia (EIT) |
92 |
 |
 |
Table 9‑1: Annex-I and Annex-B Countries[68]
Â
*These countries are not included in Annex I to the UNFCCC but in Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol
Belarus and Turkey are members of Annex I but do not have an Emissions Target in Annex B of the Kyoto Protocol
Â
In the Conference of parties only countries that have signed the Kyoto protocol have the right to participate.
After the Kyoto protocol came into force in February 2005, so-called COP MOPs (Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol) were introduced.
Â
Non-Annex I countries do not have binding emissions reduction targets for the first commitment period (2008-2012) of the Kyoto protocol. These countries are not allowed to participate in the international emissions trading market. However, they can still benefit from undertaking CDM-Projects together with an Annex I country or alone and selling the CERs to a market participant.
Â
9.2 Allocation under the Burden Sharing Agreement
Â
Member State |
CO2 allowances in mio. tonnes |
Share in EU allowances |
Installations covered |
Registry functional |
Kyoto target |
Austria |
99.0 |
1.5 % |
205 |
Yes |
-13%* |
Belgium |
188.8 |
2.9 % |
363 |
No |
-7.5%* |
Czech Republic |
292.8 |
4.4 % |
435 |
No |
-8% |
Cyprus |
16.98 |
0.3 % |
13 |
No |
– |
Denmark |
100.5 |
1.5 % |
378 |
Yes |
-21%* |
Estonia |
56.85 |
0.9 % |
43 |
No |
-8% |
Finland |
136.5 |
2.1 % |
535 |
Yes |
0%* |
France |
469.5 |
7.1 % |
1,172 |
Yes |
0%* |
Germany |
1,497.0 |
22.8 % |
1,849 |
Yes |
-21%* |
Greece |
223.2 |
3.4 % |
141 |
No |
+25% |
Hungary |
93.8 |
1.4 % |
261 |
No |
-6% |
Ireland |
67.0 |
1.0 % |
143 |
No |
+13%* |
Italy |
697.5 |
10.6 % |
1,240 |
No |
-6.5% |
Latvia |
13.7 |
0.2 % |
95 |
No |
-8% |
Lithuania |
36.8 |
0.6 % |
93 |
No |
-8% |
Luxembourg |
10.07 |
0.2 % |
19 |
No |
-28%* |
Malta |
8.83 |
0.1 % |
2 |
No |
– |
Netherlands |
285.9 |
4.3 % |
333 |
Yes |
-6%* |
Poland |
717.3 |
10.9 % |
1,166 |
No |
-6% |
Portugal |
114.5 |
1.7 % |
239 |
No |
+27%* |
Slovak Republic |
91.5 |
1.4 % |
209 |
No |
-8% |
Slovenia |
26.3 |
0.4 % |
98 |
No |
-8% |
Spain |
523.3 |
8.0 % |
819 |
Yes |
+15% |
Sweden |
68.7 |
1.1 % |
499 |
Yes |
+4%* |
United Kingdom |
736.0 |
11.2 % |
1,078 |
Yes |
-12.5%* |
Total |
6,572 |
100.0 % |
11,428 |
 |
 |
Table 9‑2: Allowance allocation in the EU
Â
Note: Figures do not take into account any opt-ins and opt-outs of installations in accordance with Article 24 and 27 of Directive 2003/87/EC.
* Under the Kyoto Protocol, the EU15 has to reduce its collective greenhouse gas emissions by 8% below 1990 levels during 2008-2012. This target is shared among the 15 Member States under a legally binding burden-sharing agreement (Council Decision 2002/358/EC of 25 April 2002). The majority of the Member States that joined the EU on 1 May 2004 have individual targets under the Kyoto Protocol with the exception of Cyprus and Malta, which have no targets.[69
Â
Date |
Convention timeline / Protocol timeline |
2005 |
– February, entry into force of Kyoto Protocol – November and December COP 11 and COP/MOP 1 (Montreal, Canada) |
2004 |
– December COP 10 (Buenos Aires, Argentina) – Buenos Aires Programme of Work on Adaptation and Response Measures |
2002 |
– October and November COP 8 (New Delhi, India) Delhi Declaration – August and September progress since 1992 reviewed at World Summit on Sustainable Development |
2001 |
– July COP 6 Bis in Bonn – resulted in agreement on a range of issues between all the major players, apart from the United States, who have withdrawn from the Kyoto process. |
2001 |
– October and November COP 7 (Marrakesh, Morocco) – Marrakesh Accords – April, IPCC Third Assessment Report – July, COP 6 resumes (Bonn Germany) – July, Bonn Agreements |
2000 |
– November COP 6 in The Hague – delegates were unable to come to an agreement, and the Conference President, Jan Pronk, suspended the meetings until July 16-27, 2001, in Bonn, Germany (informally known as COP6 bis) – Talks based on the Plan break down |
1998 |
November COP 4 in Buenos Aires – UNFCCC parties agreed to a timetable that requires all of the rules to be in place by the Sixth Conference of the Parties (COP6) – Buenos Aires Plan of Action |
1997 |
– December, COP 3 (Kyoto, Japan) – Kyoto Protocol adopted |
1995 |
– March and April, Conference of Parties COP 1 (Berlin, Germany) – March and April, Berlin Mandate |
1994 |
– March, Convention enters into force |
1992 |
– May, INC adopts UNFCCC text – June, UNFCCC opened for signature at Earth Summit |
1991 |
First meeting of the INC |
1990 |
– IPCC and second WCC call for global treaty on climate change – September, United Nations General Assembly negotiations on a framework convention |
1988 |
– Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) formed by the World meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) |
1979 |
– First World Climate Conference (WCC) |
Table 9‑3: Time line[70]
Â
Â
9.4 Carbon Dioxide Equivalents (CO2eq)
GHG |
GWP |
Carbon dioxide (C02) |
1 |
Methane (CH4) |
21 |
Nitrous oxide (N2O) |
310 |
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) |
(HFC23) 11,700 |
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) |
10,000 |
Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) |
23,900 |
Table 9‑4: GHGs and their global warming potential[71]
Â
The Table above shows the GHGs covered under the Kyoto Protocol and heir global warming potential.
Â
Â
9.5 Electricity Generation in the EU 25
About 54% of power in the EU 25 is generated burning fossil fuels, which makes the EUA price an important factor for generators.
{fusionchart id=”15″ Sources of Electricity Generation in the EU25 in %}
Graph 9‑1: Sources for Generation[72]
Â
Â
9.6 Different Types of Allowances
AAU Assigned Amount Unit |
The main currency of international emissions trading. Allocated initial emissions allowances. These are only transferred/traded between Annex-B countries in the period 2008-2012 and allow them to comply with article 3 of the Kyoto Protocol. |
CER Certified Emission Reduction |
Kyoto credits resulting from CDM (Clean Development Mechanism) projects. Transferred to the investor country. Can be used for compliance from start of protocol. |
EUA European Union Allowances |
The credits traded within the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Can only be traded between participants in the EU ETS who hold an account in one of the EU-Member states. Allowances for the second period (2008+) will be EUA as well as AAU at the same time. But AAUs from non-EU countries can not be sold into the EU ETS |
ERU Emission Reduction Unit |
Kyoto credits resulting from JI (Joint Implementation) projects and transferred to investor country. Projects can only be started after 2008. |
RMU Removal Unit |
Kyoto credits from human induced removal of greenhouse gases through LULUCF (Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry) activities in Annex I countries |
Table 9‑5: Different types of allowances
Â
9.7 Surplus of allocation over 2005 verified emissions
Â
Table 9‑6: Surplus of allocation over 2005 verified emissions[73]
Â
Emissions-to-cap (E-t-C) is calculated by subtracting the seasonally adjusted cap from emissions (actual or forecasted). This metric gives an indication of whether the market (for a specific period) is producing more or less than the seasonally adjusted cap for that same period. More specifically, if not taking CERs into account, a positive (negative) E-t-C means that the market is fundamentally short (long), suggesting a buy (sell) signal.[74]